High Density DD08 C96 Amendment Carried.
The C96 was passed through tonight, amid assertions that there is more to do, but this is a good set of steps in the right direction. ... So now the C96 gets passed to the Vic Planning Department DPCD, for final review and possibly acceptance.
There has been many changes along the way, at many stages, the current set of rules for the DPCD to consider are included below, with markups showing what was changed, and at what stage. Thanks to Teresa Dominik for providing in this colorful format. Now we just have to see what the final set of rules will achieve.
The Planning Panel suggested the new regs get a road test to see if they achieve the goals.
It might be a good test to get a development such as 5-7 Curlew Court Doncaster that did get through – challenged as an over development – and see what items the new set of regulations would do to it. we can’t change what is there, but it would show the impact of the changes…
Each of the PDF files below are about 700K. Have a look tell us what you think of the outcomes – good & bad…
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg00
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg01
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg02
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg03
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg04
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg05
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg06
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg07
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg08
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg09
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg10
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg11
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg12
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg13
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg14
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg15
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg16
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg17
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg18
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg19
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg20
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg21
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg22
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg23
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg24
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg25
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg26
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg27
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg28
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg29
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg30
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg31
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg32
Manningham-c96-carried-2013-05-28-pg33
end of document.
1 Comment
Council needs to provide the community an example of what two storey townhouse style developments, designated for allotments under 1800m2 in precinct A, will look like. How will they differ from apartment style developments in terms of appearance and density levels? Does the clause, “a townhouse style development ONLY will be considered and should be a maximum of two storeys”, mean three storey townhouse style developments will be precluded?
Amelia Tang