WEATHER STATIONS HAVE SHOWN NO WARMING

MAJORITY OF US RECORDED HIGHEST TEMPERATURES IN THIRTIES OR EARLIER

The US average hottest daily temperatures (AHDT) graph (right) shows 1905 as similar to the reading of 2015. The NOAA temperature graph shows a similar upward warming trend from 1910 to the late 1930’s but from then on a substantial warming trend in contrast to the AHDT chart showing a sharp decline.

NOAA 1880-2018 Annual Temperatures
Click to enlarge

Average Hottest Daily Temperatures
Click to enlarge

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Daily Temperatures               Source Tony Heller        realclimatescience.com

Decline In Intensity And Frequency Of Hot Weather In The US

Click to enlarge

August Max Temps  Click to enlarge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During the 1930s,

the average daily temperature across the US was well over 100 degrees, but has dropped about five degrees over the last ninety years. Australia also had its hottest years in the 1930’s by far the hottest period in Australia’s climate history. Adelaide had its hottest day on 13th January 1939 as recorded below.

Adelaide 1939             Click to enlarge

The percentage of days in US above 100 degrees has also dropped sharply, with the ten hottest years being  1936, 1934, 1954, 1930, 1925, 1980, 1913, 1925, 1918, 1901 and 1931.        US Daily Temperatures

Apart from an upward trend from 1948 to 1952 the AHDT graph shows a downward cooling trend all the way to the present day. The IPCC did announce that the world was cooling in the 70’s but then back flipped 10 years later announcing that the world was actually warming, then, when they could not produce evidence, they changed their tune and the name of the game became Climate Change.

From John Costella of Lavoisier Group wrote:

“The Climategate emails expose to our view a world that was previously hidden from virtually everyone. This formerly hidden world was made up of a very few players. But they controlled those critical Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) processes”. .They exerted previously unrecognized influence on the “peer review” process for papers seeking publication in the officially recognised climate science literature from which the IPCC was supposed to rely exclusively in order to draw its conclusions”.

“The IPCC was established by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Panel (UNEP) in 1988. From the very beginning its brief was to report on mankind’s influence on climate change”.

The mother of Greta has allowed her to be used as a marionette and cash in on her “fame” by writing a book extolling Greta’s special talents which included her ability to see carbon dioxide coming out of chimneys. She will not think kindly of her mother in years to come for her exploitation and for writing such rubbish.

10 Comments

  1. Taylor says:

    It is bad enough that the UN would brainwash and exploit an innocent child but when the mother, instead of protecting the child, allows it to happen and writes a book full of ridiculous claims. It is a shame that no one in congress would question her about her extraordinary ability to distinguish carbon dioxide from other gases coming out of chimneys.

  2. Florida Mansions says:

    The US daily weather station data is compelling because it is regarded as the most reliable in the northern hemisphere given the high number of stations evenly spread across the country. There are very few in the southern hemisphere because it consists mainly of ocean which requires a certain amount of modeling and a lot of guess work.

  3. Talford says:

    Would Global Warming zealots please stop saying that the Polar Bear population is decreasing in the Antarctic because there have never been any in that part of the world.

  4. Ray says:

    After the Green New Deal is implemented, and regular people can no longer afford to fly, can we all look forward to crossing oceans on carbon fiber composite racing yachts sponsored by the royal family of Monaco? You know it makes sense!

  5. Pushback says:

    A major blow for the science has been the recent exposure of the fraudulent hockey stick graph that was used to “prove” that the current warming of the planet was unprecedented. This came after the IPCC had previously referred to the medieval period as much warmer as evidenced by ice core studies. It was not reported by the ABC or Fairfax Media.

  6. Isobel says:

    US maximum daily temperatures graph does roughly correspond with NOAA annual temperature chart showing a rise in temperatures from 1910 to the late 1930’s then flat temperatures after that through to 1988 then a spectacular rise in temperatures to the present day. It seems as though they were both using roughly the same data until 1988 but went in indifferent directions after that. You would not expect them to line up exactly but at least they did show the same trend until 1988.
    It seems as though the climate in US got cooler while the rest of the world got warmer!
    It would be difficult to manipulate data from 1,218 weather stations across an area approximately the same area as Australia.
    Wasn’t it in 1988 when they established the IPCC whose brief it was to report on man’s influence on the climate. It was almost a directive that they confirm this by hook or by crook.

  7. Talford says:

    The government should hold talks with the school teachers to arrange for students to protest on week ends instead of preventing people from attending their place of work through the week.
    If the teachers are so concerned about climate change why are they not marching with their students?……Cowardly??

  8. Geoff says:

    It is likely that even intelligent, highly educated scientists have been caught in what has been called the “madness of crowds.” Indeed, writing in the Times Higher Education magazine, British philosopher Martin Cohen makes this connection explicit: ‘Is belief in global-warming science another example of the “madness of crowds”? That strange but powerful social phenomenon, first described by Charles Mackay in 1841, turns a widely shared prejudice into an irresistible “authority”. Could it (belief in human-caused, catastrophic global warming), indeed represent the final triumph of irrationality?’

  9. Lindsay says:

    Can you imagine how these alarmists live? They don’t have cars, dwell in caves and live on wild grasses, roots and berries. Every fart is bottled and buried deep within the earth and they knit their clothes from fig leaves.

  10. Warren says:

    The Secretary General of the Earth Summit in 1992, addressing Earth Summit II in Rio, told the thousands of climate change delegates:
    “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class— involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing — are not sustainable”.
    There goes the Sunday roast, a house to live in, the car, the occasional hamburger and generally, life on earth as we know it!!

Leave a Reply to Warren Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

*