ARCHIVED RECORDS SHOW 1990s AS HOTTEST

GLOBAL WARMING REACHED ITS PEAK IN THE NINETIES

NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, shows the average 1995 temperature at 59.7 degrees, ( 15.38 C) slightly ahead of 1990 as the warmest year since record-keeping began in 1866. Met Office recorded an average temperature in 1995 of 58.72 degrees Fahrenheit,  (14.84 C)  according to the British data, seven-hundredths of a degree F higher than the previous record, established in 1990 which happens to be the same Global temperature recorded for 2019!

By William K. Stevens    January 4th, 1996  Credit…The New York Times Archives

This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them. Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions.

NOAA    62.45 = 16.91 C      Click to enlarge

The earth’s average surface temperature climbed to a record high last year, according to preliminary figures, bolstering scientists’ sense that the burning of fossil fuels is warming the climate. Spells of cold, snow and ice like the ones this winter in the northeastern United States come and go in one region or another, as do periods of unusual warmth. But the net result globally made 1995 one of the warmest year since records first were kept in 1856, says a provisional report issued by the British Meteorological Office and the University of East Anglia.

The vast pool of warm Pacific water called El Nino, coming on top of an underlying global warming trend, lifted the earth’s average surface temperature in 1997 to the highest

levels ever recorded, Government scientists reported yesterday.The rise in temperature, measured in minute fractions of a degree to about 62 degrees Fahrenheit, (16.66 C), was not great and did not exceed the previous record by much, and several experts cautioned against making too much of it, given the role of El Nino. But they said that even if El Nino had not been a factor, the 1997 readings would have extended a broad, general trend that has made the 1990’s the world’s warmest decade since people began measuring temperatures with thermometers in the mid-19th century.

The average temperature in 1995 was 58.72 degrees Fahrenheit,  (14.84 C)  according to the British data, seven-hundredths of a degree Fahrenheit higher than the previous record, established in 1990.The British figures, based on land and sea measurements around the world, are one of two sets of long-term data by which surface temperature trends are being tracked.

The other, maintained by the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, shows the average 1995 temperature at 59.7 degrees, ( 15.38 C) slightly ahead of 1990 as the warmest year since record-keeping began in 1866. But the difference is within the margin of sampling error, and the two years essentially finished neck and neck.

The preliminary Goddard figures differ from the British ones because they are based on a somewhat different combination of observations around the world.

One year does not a trend make, but the British figures show the years 1991 through 1995 to be warmer than any similar five-year period, including the two half-decades of the 1980’s, the warmest decade on record.

This is so even though a sun-reflecting haze cast aloft by the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines cooled the earth substantially for about two years. Despite the post-Pinatubo cooling, the Goddard data show the early 1990’s to have been nearly as warm as the late 1980’s, which Goddard says was the warmest half-decade on record.

Hansen Under arrest

[In New York City by 2008] The West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water. And there will be tape across the windows across the street because of high winds. And the same birds won’t be there. The trees in the median strip will change. There will be more police cars. Why? Well, you know what happens to crime when the heat goes up… Under the greenhouse effect, extreme weather increases. Depending on where you are in terms of the hydrological cycle, you get more of whatever you’re prone to get. New York can get droughts, the droughts can get more severe and you’ll have signs in restaurants saying “Water by request only.”
– James Hansen, testimony before Congress, June 1988

Dr. James E. Hansen, the director of the Goddard center, predicted last year that a new global record would be reached before 2000, and yesterday he said he now expected that “we will still get at least a couple more” by then.

Dr. Hansen has been one of only a few scientists to maintain steadfastly that a century-long global warming trend is being caused mostly by human influence, a belief he reiterated yesterday.

Other experts would go no further than the recent findings of a United Nations panel of scientists in attributing the continuing and accelerating warming trend to human activity — specifically the emission of heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide, which is released by the burning of coal, petroleum products and wood.

The United Nations panel concluded, for the first time, that the observed warming is “unlikely to be entirely natural in origin” and that the evidence “suggests a discernible human influence on climate.”

Previously, few scientists apart from Dr. Hansen had been willing to go even that far, contending that the relatively small warming so far could easily be a result of natural climate variability. Even now, most experts say it is unclear whether human activity is responsible for a little of the warming or a lot.

“I think we’re beginning to see it,” Dr. Phil Jones of the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia said of the human influence on climate, adding that he agreed with the United Nations report.

“I don’t think you can say much from one year’s values,” he said, “but this figure from ’91 to ’95 is quite illuminating.” He said it was nearly half a degree above the 1961-90 benchmark average of 58 degrees.

Both the 1995 record high temperature and the strikingly warm half-decade of the early 1990’s are “consistent with the sort of expectation we have of the interplay between natural and manmade influences,” said Dr. Tom M. L. Wigley of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo.

If things had not turned out that way, he said, “we would have been pretty surprised and maybe a little concerned” about the United Nations panel’s conclusion. Nevertheless, he said, “it’s not the sort of thing you want to over-interpret or overemphasize.”

Dr. Wigley was a member of a subcommittee of the United Nations panel that dealt specifically with the question of detecting a human role in climate change.

The panel predicted that the heat-trapping gas emissions would cause the average global temperature, now approaching 60 degrees Fahrenheit, to rise by a further 1.8 to 6.3 degrees, with a best estimate of 3.6 degrees, by 2100.

By comparison, the world is 5 to 9 degrees warmer now than in the last ice age more than 10,000 years ago. The predicted warming, if it materializes, would likely cause widespread climatic disruption, the United Nations panel said.

The margin of seven-hundredths of a degree by which the 1995 global average exceeds that of 1990, according to the new British data, sounds small. But it represents an increase of nearly half a degree from the post-Pinatubo low, in 1992. As scientists had previously predicted, the recovery from the Pinatubo cooling became obvious last year, though no record was set.

The 1995 figure is all the more remarkable, Dr. Hansen said, because it was established at a time when two natural warming influences were neutralized. The solar energy cycle was at a low ebb, and the warming effect of El Nino, the pool of warm Pacific water that appeared in early 1995, was offset by a turn to cooler-than-normal conditions in the tropical Pacific later in the year.

A different picture emerges from an analysis of satellite measurements of global temperature by Dr. John R. Christy of the University of Alabama and Dr. Roy Spencer of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala. While their data show temperature fluctuations roughly paralleling those in the surface measurements, the values are lower: 1995 was only an ordinary year compared with the data set’s 1982-91 average.

NOAA Annual Global Temperatures recorded in the nineties had overstated the warming trend,  62.45 F (16.91 C)  in 1997 and 62.30 F and 16.83 C in 1995. The error may have been due to a miscalculation of the 30 year average temperature between 1961-1900 by using 16.49 C as a base line instead of about 14.00 C.

It said: The global average temperature of 62.45 degrees Fahrenheit for 1997 was the warmest year on record, surpassing the previous record set in 1995 by 0.15 degrees Fahrenheit. The chart reflects variations from the 30-year average (1961-1990) of the combined land and sea surface temperatures.
Global Climate Report – Annual 1997 | State of the Climate …

www.ncdc.noaa.gov › sotc › global › 199713

 

7 Comments

  1. Laura Dana says:

    NOAA did use the wrong formula and have apologised for their error. Both NASA and Met Office were well above the global temperatures of today but apparently they were accepted at the Kyoto Climate conference in 2007.

  2. Russell says:

    The vast pool of warm Pacific water called El Nino, coming on top of an underlying global warming trend, lifted the earth’s average surface temperature in 1997 to the highest levels ever recorded, Government scientists reported yesterday.

    The rise in temperature, measured in minute fractions of a degree to about 62 degrees Fahrenheit, 16.66 degrees Celsius was not great and did not exceed the previous records by much, and several experts cautioned against making too much of it, given the role of El Nino.
    This was published at the time it was recorded by the New York Times.

  3. Gary says:

    They went to RIO at the behest of environmentalists with very little evidence of warming for the 1992 conference. What struck me as odd was that overpopulation has never been on the UN agenda. Even the Paris accord in 2015 failed to address the burgeoning problem. My wife was getting updates from a girlfriend who was covering the the event on behalf of a British magazine called Queen Bee.”This is ridiculous overpopulation is not even mentioned”.

  4. Talford says:

    The IPCC say that at least half the warming between 1951 and 2010 (0.800 C) and more than half of that was caused by man’s activities and almost all the warming between 1880 to 1950 (0.270 C) was due to natural variability. Could we then say that at least 0.500 C was due to natural causes?

  5. Sel Murray says:

    This was is the temperature data they dished up at Kyoto. Its over now because we have been given a dose of reality with this Covid-19 virus. There will be no grants for the scam any longer as the world strives to recover their economies using fossil fuels, that gave us our standard of living, in the process. Get back to school Greta!

  6. Warren says:

    The British readings showed that the average global temperature in 1988 was 0.612 degrees Fahrenheit higher than the long-term average for the period 1950 through 1979, which is a base for comparing global temperatures. The average worldwide temperature for that 30-year period is roughly 59 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Centigrade) the British researchers said.
    New York Times February 4th, 1989, section 1, page 1.
    Dr. Hansen’s research group reported on the basis of temperature measurements on land that last year tied with 1987 as the fourth warmest year since comparable records were first kept in 1880. In both years, the average surface temperature was 59.58 degrees Fahrenheit. The 1990 record high was 59.85 degrees (15.44 C). The eight warmest years since 1880 have all occurred in the 1980’s and 1990’s, the Goddard group said: A Global Warming Resumed in 1994, Climate Data Show By William K. Stevens Jan. 27, 1995 New York Times

  7. Doris Tran says:

    No one knew what the temperatures were prior to at least 2000. How else could NOAA possibly post a temperature of two degrees warmer than 2019?
    Most of the old data has simply been filled in to suit the narrative.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

*