LINE GRAPHS SHOW LESS WARMING

The IPCC, UN and WMO claim that the last twenty years have been the warmest since global temperatures were first measured back in the 1880’s. But apparently there were no official graphs, like what NOAA has produced, until after 1998 when Phil Jones, a senior climatologist at CRU East Anglia and also a senior member of the Hockey Stick team, was able to broker agreement where all parties would post a global temperature of around 58 degrees Fahrenheit.

The above anomalies are a variation from a baseline temperature of 13.90 degrees Celsius and each year’s values have been drawn in a ratio of height to temperature from the Zero Y-axis at the bottom of the graph. The sudden rise in temperature from 2014 to 2015 was due to adjustments made by Tom Karl of NOAA just before the Paris conference in 2015. These changes looked suspicious but were accepted by the WMO, IPCC and the United Nation’s delegates. This is a far cry from the higher temperatures published by NASA in the 80’s & 90’s.

This graph is supposed to show a warming of +0.20 degrees Celsius, the same as the above graph but instead it has no zero Y- axis which enables it to show a steep line of warming that would otherwise be similar to the above.

This is another from the fraudulent WMO with no zero Y-axis, unelected mind you, along with the UN who have directed that they be used in Schools.

Below is how a graph should be drawn. It has the same annual temperatures as the above but you won’t see it in any of the publicly funded agencies. This is not science that we are looking at here but it is for the purpose of obtaining further funding by deception. Manningham council has declared a climate emergency based on this rubbish and meanwhile our politicians are doing nothing. The Chart below is from Abhinav’s Lying with Charts website who made the following comment: “When you resort to such gimmickry to buttress your point, it not only hurts your credibility but also harms the cause”.

2 Comments

  1. Angela says:

    Both Dr. Hansen and Dr. Jones said that 1991 would undoubtedly fall short of the 1990 record, which pegged the average surface temperature of the globe at just under 60 degrees. Through the first 11 months, Dr. Hansen said, 1991 was the second warmest year, and he said that the volcano haze makes it “extremely improbable” that December would enable it to overtake 1990. Dr. Jones said 1991 would probably rank from second to fourth warmest. It is my understanding that they had no faith in the warming they had declared in 1991 because they believed it was too warm and would have been better to post a lower temperature to give them wriggle room if ever accurate temperature measuring became possible.

  2. Ike Whittaker says:

    The step up of temperatures from 2014 to 2015 looks as though the data had been cooked. Some day these people behind the scenes will be held to account. Trillions of dollars are locked up in this scam but when it collapses, as it will, it will be brutal

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

*