REMOVE OR ADD CARBON DIOXIDE?
The IPCC wants the world to reduce carbon dioxide emissions because the earth is boiling. Most of the Councils in Australia have declared a climate emergency accompanied by a deadline on when to achieve net zero emissions. Manningham Council were one of the first to come on board: “Thank you to everyone who contributed to this important plan. It really will take a community effort to respond to the climate emergency locally and is critical we are prepared to tackle climate risks including extreme weather, heatwaves, bushfires, storms and flooding.“We will continue to engage on how we put the plan into action so the community feels supported in reaching net zero emissions by 2035″.
However, there were councils who wanted to employ carbon dioxide extraction plants instead of employing what they believed to be the ridiculous support for renewables which could not be better exampled than in the movie below.
Excerpts from the interview with Professor William Happer
Professor William Happer on the effect of carbon dioxide on planet Earth
It’s true. CO2 is a greenhouse gas and it warms the Earth, but the warming isn’t enough to matter. It’s very small. And so, it’s probably beneficial on balance. If you double CO2, it seems like a lot, that’s a 100% increase of CO2. How much does that affect the cooling radiation that goes off to space? That sounds like a lot, but in effect it only decreases the radiation to space by 1%. So, 100% increase of CO2, 1% decrease in radiation to space. It’s a very small effect, and you don’t have to change the Earth’s temperature very much or cloudiness very much to bring it back into equilibrium with the situation before you increase the CO2.”
“So, it’s an ineffective climate influencer. Yet you get this demon gas that is going to cause us all to boil to death or something like that. Nothing could be further from the truth. It’s a trivial gas, but it’s very, very good for life on Earth. More CO2 has been wonderful for mankind because it helps provide the abundance of food we have today and it’s caused no harm, whatever”.
see link below
2 Comments
In 1978, the New York Times reported there was too little temperature data from the Southern Hemisphere to draw any reliable conclusions. The report, prepared by German, Japanese and American specialists, appeared in the Dec. 15 issue of Nature, the British journal and stated that “Data from the Southern Hemisphere, particularly south of latitude 30 south, are so meager that reliable conclusions are not possible,” the report said.
“Ships travel on well-established routes so that vast areas of ocean, are simply not traversed by ships at all, and even those that do, may not return weather data on route”.
We had issues with Manningham’s refusal to allow public comment on a Council decision that had already been made, except for our order of preference to the mitigation measures they had planned to implement.