Professor Tim Ball, who was sued by Michael Mann for defamation regarding comments he made about the integrity of the Hockey Stick Graph, had succeeded in having the case thrown out and Mann ordered to pay costs. Mann had failed to comply with a court order that he produce his Hockey Stick Data! His current action against action against journalist Mark Steyn, for damages, who also called the infamous hockey stick graph as fraudulent, looks like going in the same direction. The case has enormous ramifications since it can be argued that the hockey stick removed the concept of natural climate variability for an entire generation. It was fraudulent, claims Steyn, both in its construction and in the uses to which it has been put by Al Gore, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, every school and most governments throughout the world.

According to the director of Nobel Institute Michael Mann was never awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, despite Mann’s public claims that he was. In court papers filed in connection with a defamation suit, Mann claims he was “awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.” Global warming alarmists who assist the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its various reports frequently describe themselves as Nobel Prize winners.

The Nobel Institute awarded the IPCC a Peace Prize for its efforts to address climate change. The alarmists who participate in the IPCC report-writing process claim to be Nobel Prize winners to puff up their credentials to the media and to attempt to claim greater scientific credibility than skeptics in the global warming debate. Ironically, many skeptics also participate in the IPCC process, but few make the bold and self-serving claim of being Nobel Prize winners.

Washington Examiner writer Thomas Richard sent an email to Geir Lundestad, director of the Nobel Institute, pointing out how Mann claims to be a Nobel Prize winner. Richard asked if Mann’s Nobel Prize claim is true. Lundestad responded:

“1) Michael Mann has never been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

2) He did not receive any personal certificate. He has taken the diploma awarded in 2007 to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (and to Al Gore) and made his own text underneath this authentic-looking diploma.

3) The text underneath the diploma is entirely his own. We issued only the diploma to the IPCC as such. No individuals on the IPCC side received anything in 2007.”

Lundestad added, “Unfortunately we often experience that members of organizations that have indeed been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize issue various forms of personal diplomas to indicate that they personally have received the Nobel Peace Prize. They have not.”

Unwilling to accept the Nobel Institute’s determination gracefully, Mann bitterly tweeted, “IPCC certificate acknowledging me ‘contributing to award of the Nobel Peace Prize’. Do they want my birth certif too?”

So there you have it: The Nobel Institute denies it ever awarded a prize to Michael Mann. I guess it is time to add the Nobel Institute to the long list of Michael Mann-designated “deniers.”

SOURCE: Washington Examiner

Michael Mann who has recently appeared on the ABC Four Corners Program just prior to the upcoming May 2022 Federal election, was asked by US Congress, back in 2017, if he was connected to a group called the Climate Accountability Institute (CAI) who had written to the president asking that deniers be prosecuted by using the RICO statute. For those who are not familiar with Corrupt Organization Act – RICO – 1970, it was used to rein in the American Mafia. Environmental activists thought they had found a new weapon to use in their battle with global warming realists: the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), a law enacted by Congress in 1970 to battle the mafia. Environmentalists had hoped to use RICO to criminalize any exercise of free speech that was critical of their extreme views on climate change. Michael Mann denied he was affiliated with the Climate Accountability Institute but according to their website he was a director! Link to video link:


The problem for the Climate Scientists, the  IPCC and the supporters of AGW, was that  they they had to prove that the current phase of warming was unnatural, unique and unprecedented. If a similar or greater warming period had occurred in the past such as during the Medieval Warming Period (MWP), then clearly any such recent warming must have been natural and not the result of human activities.

Proponents of the IPCC hypothesis that human CO2 is causing global warming were mainly connected with the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia. Leaked CRU emails, beginning with 1000 in late 2009, exposed the corruption of climate science of the IPCC. CRU people controlled critical portions of IPCC Working Group I.They set up procedures to control the peer-review process, control data, and attack any who challenged, especially if it was with contradicto evidence. This was necessary because they deliberately thwarted the scientific method by presenting an hypothesis and blocking normal and essential skepticism. They determined to prove rather than disprove the hypothesis. As Richard Lindzen correctly observed decades ago, the consensus was reached before the research had even begun. Evidence emerged, despite their efforts, so they created pseudo scientific vehicles to counterattack.




  1. Judith Carlson says:

    All Michael Mann has to do to clear his name is to produce his Hockey Stick data…its that simple. Obviously he won’t because it is flawed. The so called experts on the gravy train who support him will continue to prop him up and pay his legal fees to save their own skins. The fact that he is a liar won’t matter he will remain a powerful man.

  2. Sel says:

    Big tech will continue protecting him until the warming con unravels. His claim that he received a Nobel Peace prize award was not correct.. he was in fact a member of a group of scientists who shared the award.

  3. Angela Garby says:

    The Sun dictates Earth’s climate, the animals that inhabit it do not!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *