GLOBAL TEMPERATURE “FINALISED” JUST BEFORE PARIS CONFERENCE

The Global temperatures that were presented at the Paris Climate Conference in December 2015 were proof that the world was warming and there was an urgent need for countries to pledge their support for a CO2 reduction scheme which became known as the “Paris Accord”. Manhattan Institute senior fellow Oren Cass, one of the very few who had read the Paris Agreement, told John Stossel, television presenter that it was “somewhere between a farce and a fraud”.

Feeling the heat between 2014-2015.

“You didn’t have to mention greenhouse gases, just send in any piece of paper you want, “this is amazing” “My favorite was Pakistan, whose pledge was to ‘Reach a peak at some point after which to begin reducing emissions,’” says Cass. “You can staple those together, and you can say we now have a global agreement, but what you have is an agreement to do nothing”. NOAA, who would normally publish temperatures in the early part of following year, were able to publish the 2015 temperature well before the Paris conference in November 2015. There had been no warming to speak of between 2001 and 2013 except for 0.28 C of warming between 2013 and 2015!                               

2001 (0.51 C),  2002 (0.56 C), 2003 (0.56 C). 2004 (0.54 C) 2005 (0.58 C),

2006 (0.54 C), 2007 (0.55 C),  2008 (0.49 C) 2009 (0.56 C) 2010 (0.62 C),

2011 (0.51 C),  2012  (0.57 C), 2013  (0.62 C) 2014 (0.69 C)  2015 (0.90 C).

Original anomalies above have all been increased in the ten warmest years segment of each subsequent report. The revised data has shown that global warming is real and that we must take steps to reduce our CO2 emissions, so they tell us, but why was it necessary to increase annual anomalies by up to 0.08 C ? 

2001 (0.54 C), 2002 (0.60 C), 2003 (0.61 C), 2004 (0.57 C), 2005 (0.65 C),

2006 (0.61 C), 2007 (0.61 C),  2008 (0.54 C),2009 (0.63 C), 2010 (0.70 C),

2011 (0.57 C),  2012 (0.62 C),  2013 (0.66 C), 2014 (0.74 C), 2015 (0.90 C)

NOAA changes e.g. 2010 from 0.62 C to 0.70 C relative to a baseline of 13.90 C.

Revised anomalies confirmed in Sixteen Warmest Years (1880-2015) below.

Sixteen Warmest Years (1880–2015)

The following table lists the global combined land and ocean temperature anomalies ranked in order of warmest of each in the years since 1880.

Rank
1 = Warmest
Period of Record: 1880–2015
Year Anomaly °C
1 2015  0.90
2 2014  0.74. .69  + 0.5 C
3 2010  0.70…62  + 0.8 C
4 2013  0.66…62  + 0.4 C
5 2005  0.65…58  + 0.7 C
6 (tie) 1998  0.63...58  + 0.5 C
6 (tie) 2009  0.63…56  + 0.7 C
2012  0.62.. 57  + 0.5 C
9 (tie) 2003  0.61…56  + 0.5 C
9 (tie) 2006  0.61…54  + 0.7 C
9 (tie) 2007  0.61…56  + 0.5 C
12 2002  0.60.  56  + 0.4 C
13 (tie) 2004  0.57…54  + 0.3 C
13 (tie) 2011  0.57…51  + 0.6 C
15 (tie) 2001  0.54…51  + 0.3 C
15 (tie) 2008  0.54..49  + 0.5 C

Anomalies changes above right in each report’s ten warmest year segment.

Confirmed by NOAA in table below….. “revised” anomalies

NOAA Raised Temperatures

NASA Planetary Fact Sheet Data….Earth mean temperature is 15 degrees Celsius

5 Comments

  1. Nancy Bourne says:

    14.90 C was just short of the dreaded 15.23 C, the 1.5 C above the pre-industrial temperature of 13.73 C, it varies, depending on whose data set you read. They have overcooked the data in their endeavour to reach the 1.5 C especially with the British temperature records.

  2. John says:

    I would like to know the amount of emissions saved by not having to use a close dryer compared with high rise apartment dwellers who have no alternative.

  3. Murray says:

    How can you believe these warming groups, when NOAA, the publicly funded grandfather of global warming, jacks up global warming without explanation?

    1. Skeeta says:

      That is exactly what happened in 1997 when Tom Karl, head of NOAA, posted a global temperature of 62.45 F. Including a graph showing temperatures from 1900 that averaged 61.70 F ! No wonder he retired in 2016!

  4. Celine Garby says:

    It’s a con. It has probably been 15 C (59 F) all along–they are so far into this idiocy that there is no turning back

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

*