Westfield parking tower – unlikely capacity

There are currently approx 287 car spaces in the car park in which the new Westfield Parking tower is to be located. They claim 854 spaces but it appears they have not deducted the number of spaces displaced. It would be hard for outsiders to accurately calculate without knowing its exact position.

Westfield Parking Station 003

More About Bus Tunnels and Bridges

Comments below from Nick and Con was posted today re Bus Tunnels and Bridges, and they had some Interesting Cycling and Pedestrian info to share with it…

DH Ped&Cycl Plan First Proposed                        Revised Ped & cycle circuit plan

Doncaster Hill was a Continue reading More About Bus Tunnels and Bridges →

Completions Since Doncaster Hill Strategy Approved in 2002 – Not good for Trains

It is hard to justify spending 4- 6 Billion Dollars on a Doncaster Hill Station with only seven apartment buildings completed since 2002.


There are no Doncaster Hill developments currently under construction. Apart from 7-11 Berkley Street, completed in December 2013, the last development finished  was the Madison in June 2012. See below Continue reading Completions Since Doncaster Hill Strategy Approved in 2002 – Not good for Trains →

Localy Employed and Method of travel to work – Manningham


City of Manningham

Residents’ place of work

36,052, or 67.8% of the City of Manningham’s working residents travel outside of the area to work.

Where do the City of Manningham’s residents go to work? Journey to Work data shows how many residents work locally, and how many commute out of the area and where they commute to. Some areas consist mainly of dormitory’ suburbs and the majority of the residents commute out to work.  Other areas have large employment centres which attract a local workforce. Understanding where the City of Manningham’s residents go to work assists in planning and advocacy for roads and public transport provision. Continue reading Localy Employed and Method of travel to work – Manningham →


It is strange Manningham Council now talk about the problem of traffic congestion when their own consultants (GTA) had failed to raise the issue in any of their preliminary studies except for a grade separation for pedestrians….

Manningham engineers advise, with or without the provision of rail at Doncaster Hill, a grade-separation of buses will be required through the Hill. Plans have yet to be completed but it is likely, given the area topography, a combination of both bridges and tunnels would be needed to achieve the desired grade separation

Without this, road-based public transport services will fail to operate successfully on Doncaster Hill due to Continue reading BUS TUNNELS AND BRIDGES TO AVOID DONCASTER HILL GRIDLOCK →


This was sent in by Richard King, while it’s focus is on Manningham rail, it does explain the bigger picture, particularly funding issues and time frames.

I can’t understand why they keep the prospect of a rail service alive, after all the promises and studies etc, most people believe if it were viable it would have happened by now.

Only 22 people turned up to a rail forum addressed by Tim Gosbell not about 100 as reported in the leader.

Note: Diagram below showing proposed lines that have not been built. Continue reading THE RAILWAY DREAM – Melbourne →

1 Billion Plan for Monorail to Melbourne Airport in a few years

These articles were in the Age & Sun today…

A proposal from private entrepreneur Peter O’Brien  for a driver-less high speed train over the Tullamarine freeway.

The Age Plan for monorail to Melbourne Airport

The Sun  Bold plan to build $1 billion monorail above the Tullamarine Freeway under way

It is said to be cheaper than Heavy or Light rail, but likely to take years to come online…


Rail Phase one Study Recommendtions

In case you wanted to know what the Study for Manningham’s rail had achieved so far, you can find the entire indexed documents here: Continue reading Rail Phase one Study Recommendtions →

Forecast on the Hill

 Doncaster Hill was the focus of Manningham Growth and the jewel in the crown. However we seem to be getting further away from those expectations every time we review…

From Francis Day

After trawling through reports and studies regarding the Doncaster Hill strategy, we were amazed at the number of flaky assumptions and flawed reports used by Manningham council to justify Doncaster Hill as a principal Activity Centre.

In 2002 Manningham Council officers and their consultants had forecast the population of Doncaster Hill Activity Centre would increase from about 950 to 8,000 residents by 2021. (later updated to 8,300). 2,500 were forecast for 2006, 5,000 by 2011 and in 2014 the population was expected to reach almost 6000.

However, Census of 2011 indicates the population of Doncaster Hill was only 1,194, compared to 794 in 2006 an increase of only 400 residents, 3,806 less than the 5000 Manningham had predicted.

Manningham Officers and consultant’s had predicted that Continue reading Forecast on the Hill →

History Of Rail Endeavour Manningham 1890 to 2014

Bel Harris has been doing her home work – follow on from Rail Ad wasted funds… Addressed to Joe Carbone CEO of Manningham.


Our politicians will not say , but our faceless bureaucrats have already decided that buses will be the transport solution for Doncaster Hill which might help explain the timing of the recent announcements for dedicated bus lanes, shortened travelling times from Doncaster to the city and the way the Premier and the Mayor of Melbourne are now waffling about the disruption and possible closure of Swanston Street, hinting the MMP may be delayed.

The closest we came to getting a rail line to Doncaster was when the government approved the 1972 rail plan. It was officially cancelled after an independent panel recommended against it in 1991, but it was already dead and buried in 1984 when the land reserved for its construction, was sold off.

None of the Doncaster rail studies before or after have achieved anything other than to pacify commuters. There have been at least 10 comprehensive studies conducted over time; 1890, 1920, 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2012, the latest costing $6.5 million.

 Brief history taken from internet.

  • Doncaster rail was first proposed by state parliament in 1890,
  • Doncaster rail was included in the state plan for general development in 1929,
  • Doncaster Rail was included in the Bolte government’s transportation plan in 1969,
  • Doncaster Rail route from Victoria Park to East Doncaster, was finally decided upon in 1972.
  • Rapid transport buses were proposed for Doncaster Hill by the Brumby government in 2008,
  • The Napthine government starts a detailed rail study in 2011
  • The first proposal in 1890, was to consider a line from Heidelberg Station which went nowhere.
  • Detailed plans again re-emerged in1969 for a line which would branch off the Hurstbridge/Epping line at Victoria Park and run down the Eastern Freeway median strip to Bulleen Road, Bulleen where it would travel between houses and via a series of tunnels to East Doncaster, which was finally approved in 1972.
  • Despite rising costs, the state governments of the period continued to make assurances that the line would be built. Property acquisition for part of the route was completed in 1975, and construction of a cutting at the city end commenced in 1974, only to be filled in two years later. By 1982 plans to build the line were shelved by the state government, and by 1984, the land reserved for the line once it left the freeway, was sold. In 1991 an independent report investigated constructing the line, recommended against it due to the high cost.

Manningham’s rail submission stated that there will be a grade separation for Bus routes through the Hill irrespective of whether there is rail to Doncaster hill. Does this mean there will be tunnelling? Are you able to provide a plan of what is proposed, a cost estimate and how it will be financed?

My apologies for quoting the normal rate for the Leader full page rail advertisement without taking into account you would have received a substantial discount.

Kind regards,