NATURE CONTROLS EARTH CLIMATE, NOT HUMANS DR.EDWIN BERRY
At the heart of Berry’s argument lies the Climate Equivalence Principle, which states that human and natural CO2 molecules are identical and therefore must behave identically in the atmosphere. This simple physics principle, Berry demonstrates, invalidates the entire basis for climate policies costing trillions of dollars worldwide. Using the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change’s own data and established atmospheric physics, he proves that human CO2 emissions account for only about 33 parts per million of the 140 ppm increase since 1750 meaning nature, not human activity, controls atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.
Dr. Edwin X. Berry brings a unique perspective to the climate debate. With over 1,600 citations in atmospheric physics, a PhD in theoretical physics, and decades of real-world experience flying research missions through ice storms and studying cloud formation, Berry possesses the scientific credentials that climate establishment figures often lack. Yet his conclusions directly contradict everything we’re told about human CO2 and climate change. In the comprehensive analysis, Berry presented what he called the most important breakthrough in climate science since 1980—one that completely dismantled the foundation of climate alarmism.
Illustration below is from Professor Tim Ball.
It was expected there would be a substantial increase in CO2 emissions accompanied by a rise in global temperatures due to the second world war but neither had occurred in the period between 1936-1951. The IPCC said Aerosols—tiny airborne particles from pollution, dust, and fires—have a net cooling effect on the planet, masking roughly one third of gobal warming (about 0.4∘C to 0.5 C) They cool Earth by scattering sunlight and making clouds brighter. However, reducing aerosol pollution improves air quality but may accelerate warming….hardly convincing!
3 Comments
It seems that Berry and Ball are on a similar page! Would I be correct if I said the level of CO2 due to mankind would amount to 3.4% of 4% equals 0.00136 %.
Other comments by Dr. Ball: The biggest problem for the public is they can’t believe that an apparent majority of scientists seem to support the IPCC science. The simple answer is, very few are familiar with the science. They, like most of the public, assume other scientists would not distort, manipulate, or do anything other than proper science.
Michael Mann sued Tim Ball who was alledged to have made derogatory statements about Mann’s Hockey Stick graph. Mann would or could not produce his data after several years resulting in costs etc being awarded to Tim Ball.